I feel like everyone means something different when they talk about “saving the earth”.
For some it means taking care of the environmental damage we have done to the ozone, oceans, etc. For others it means making sure animals don’t go endangered. And yet for others it means feeding starving children, buying “fair trade”, eating local… and the list could go on.
I recently had a conversation with a friend that involved a lot of interesting ideas and prompted some difficult questions and discussions. One thing that we didn’t get into, and that I haven’t encountered a lot of people going into, is the philosophical aspects of “saving the world”.
This isn’t meant to be comprehensive or even necessarily coherent… just a collection of some of the thoughts in my head.
Who says the world needs to be saved? From what? From humans, most would answer… from the damage we’ve done to it.
But what makes some people think that we “owe” anything to the planet we live on? Where does that sense come from? Many people obviously do not have it, as we can see quite clearly from how we’ve polluted and used up natural resources with no thought for consequences or making amends.
Some don’t focus as much on the planet itself but rather on the people. Feeding starving children, educating and giving medical services to the poor and sick, fighting for human rights, etc. But who is it that says we “owe” anything to the other human beings on this planet?
These are questions that don’t have answers, when looked at from a purely philosophical point of view. You can call on spiritual beliefs or moral beliefs or even laws to try and provide answers, but objectively, the answers do not “exist” somewhere to be found. We make our own. I think its important to understand this.
We try and “save” whatever we believe to be most in need of saving. Everyone has their own cause. None are more important than the other, even though individual people may believe that their cause is more important than all. I think we could work together better if we didn’t spend quite so much time looking down at other people for not doing what they can to help whatever our current “cause” is.
I’m not sure if this came out clearly.
I personally believe that the world is in dire need of “saving”, and I’m painfully aware of the fact that we are leaving this earth in a disgraceful state for our children and grandchildren, not to mention all the plants and animals that have suffered unnecessarily because of us. I’m also painfully aware that there are individual humans, everywhere, in need of food, water, clothing, shelter, medicine, education, rights, and love. I don’t think that any one individual life is any less important than the need to “save the world”.
After all, what are we saving the world FOR? Is it really objectively the “right” thing to do to protect the planet at the expense of the human beings who live on it, most of whom are as innocent as the proverbial polar bear on the melting iceberg? Of course, I believe its equally “not right” to protect human beings at the expense of the rest of the creatures/life that our collective actions have harmed.
I don’t propose any answers, only speculations. I still have so much to learn. Everyone has different, conflicting, but equally valid ideas and thoughts about this giant problem, and I can’t really say that any one way is right over another, without knowing all the facts.